April 30, 2013:
On April 30, 2013 Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Appeal from the April 2, 2013 decision dismissing the First Amended Complaint. The appeal will be heard in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.
April 30, 2013: Notice of Appeal
April 4, 2013:
On April 2, 2013, the Court issued a decision dismissing the First Amended Complaint on the ground that, in Judge Baer's view, it did not state a claim. The Plaintiffs are confident of the merits of their position and are considering how they will next proceed in this matter.
April 2, 2013: The Court Dismisses the First Amended Complaint for Failure to
State a Claim
February 9, 2013: New Update
The following court papers have been filed to date in the lawsuit Keiler et al. v. Harlequin Enterprises Limited et al.
November 30, 2012: Harlequin's Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint.
July 19, 2012:
World's #1 Romance Publisher Harlequin Subject of Class Action Suit
A class action lawsuit was filed today against Harlequin Enterprises, Ltd., the world's leading publisher of romance fiction, as well as Harlequin Books S.A., a Swiss corporation, and Harlequin Enterprises B.V., a Dutch corporation, on behalf of authors who entered into contracts with the company.
This lawsuit results from Defendant Harlequin Enterprises Limited, the world’s leading publisher of romance fiction, depriving Plaintiffs and the other authors in the class, of e-book royalties due to them under publishing agreements entered into between 1990 and 2004. Harlequin required the authors to enter into those agreements with a Swiss entity that it created for tax purposes, and that it dominates and controls. However, Harlequin, before and after the signing of these agreements, performed all the publishing functions related to the agreements, including exercising, selling, licensing, or sublicensing the e-book rights granted by the authors. Instead of paying the authors a royalty of 50% of its net receipts as required by the agreements, an intercompany license was created by Harlequin with its Swiss entity resulting in authors receiving 3% to 4% of the e-books' cover price as their 50% share instead of 50% of Harlequin Enterprises' receipts.
What this means to the authors can be illustrated by an e-book with a hypothetical cover price of $8.00. The “net receipts” made by Harlequin Enterprises Limited from the exercise, sale or license of e-book rights would be at least $4.00, of which authors would be entitled to $2.00 based on their 50% royalty. Computing the “net receipts” based on the “license” between Harlequin's Swiss entity and Harlequin Enterprises, Plaintiffs’ 50% royalty amounts to only 24 to 32 cents.
The lawsuit alleges, among other claims, that on contracts between 1990-2004:
The Harlequin authors are represented by lead counsel, David B. Wolf, DavidWolfLaw pllc and co-counsel, Michael J. Boni, Boni & Zack LLC. For more information on the law firms involved, please click here. Further details are also available on the FAQs page.